Saturday, January 15, 2005

What’s Wrong With the Left Side of Bush’s Face?

Yesterday, the Bushmaton acknowledged that he probably was “too blunt” a couple of times during his first term. But, he said, he got that trait from his mother. During this peculiar confession, all TV news reports showed two clips of Bush. The first was on July 2, 2003 when he said, “Bring ‘em on”, answering anyone who suggested US forces might be attacked for bringing democracy to Iraq. The second was his “Wanted Dead or Alive” remark on September 17, 2001 which stated his druthers regarding Osama Bin Laden. Since Bush seemed to be saying that he might possibly have been wrong to make these low-class comments, we also were shown a clip of Bush during his second debate October 8, 2004 with John Kerry. Kerry asked Bush to name three instances in which he had made a wrong decision, and Bush could not think of one instance. Seeing the sound bites of Bush on July 2, 2003, October 8, 2004 and January 14, 2005 two things were obvious. Most views of Bush were filmed showing the right side of his face. But on all three clips when he was filmed from his left side, the corner of his mouth drooped and the entire left side of his face from his nose to his jaw looked like he’d been given a shot of procaine which is an anesthetic that blocks facial nerves during dental procedures. On January 13, 2002, George W. Bush fell off a couch; on June 13, 2003, George W. Bush fell off a Segway; on May 22, 2004, George W. Bush fell off his bike. We are being lied to about the state of George Bush’s health. Either he’s back on the bottle...which he may be, but that doesn’t account for the partial paralysis of his face. Or he’s had a stroke. These conjectures have been made before. Particularly after photos were displayed of his battered face the day after he supposedly choked on a pretzel, fainted and fell off a couch. But seeing the film clips from July 2, 2003 to yesterday, it’s clear that something is wrong with the nerves and muscle control of the left side of George W. Bush’s face. My money is on the Bushmaton having had his first stroke on January 13, 2002 and that he has had two TIAs (transient ischemic attacks) since that date. There are many reasons why George W. Bush is unfit to govern, but the state of his health looms larger all the time as the biggest reason. Just watch his television appearances. The man is impaired. We all need to acquaint ourselves with the 25th Amendment to the Constitution which deals with a President becoming physically or mentally (or morally) incapable of performing his duties. Of course the question arises, would Cheney be a better US President for the country and for the world than Bush? No, he wouldn’t. But when President Bush is relieved of his duties because he is too ill to perform them (and has been too ill for a long time), at least the Republicans in the United States (the world already knows this) would have to face up to the fact they have been lied to from the get-go by everyone about everything.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Could he back on the white powder? Or something similar?

That would explain his megalomania.


Lise

Québec