When
people say our lives were simpler sixty years ago, they mean it was easier to remain
unthinking and ignorant sixty years ago. It was easier to live unexamined lives
sixty years ago. Sixty years ago we were not faced daily with opinions and
facts that were diametrically opposed to our own. We could have black and white
beliefs about the world and have those beliefs corroborated by our
like-thinking neighbors, like-thinking politicians, and like-thinking newspapers.
We could go for months on end without having our beliefs refuted or challenged.
This
was a choice sixty years ago.
And
many people opted for this choice. Those that didn’t decide to remain ignorant had
complicated lives sixty years ago, just as we do today.
The
topic of banning the use of cell phones by vehicle drivers has come up due to a
study by the National Transportation Safety Board. The study reports that cell
phone use causes distractions and these distractions are causing accidents on
the road. Therefore, all cell phone use by vehicle drivers should be banned,.
The
people against the ban say that hands-free cell-phone use is as safe for
drivers as when they talk to a passenger.
But
a complicating factor needs to be studied before a course can be set regarding
vehicle drivers and their use of cell phones.
What
area of the brain is used when hands-free cell phones are used by drivers? Is
it a different area of the brain in use than when drivers talk to passengers?
And if it is a different area, is the use of this area of the brain more likely
to be a distraction than when a driver talks to a passenger?
The
larger question, of course, is: How ignorant do we want to be in this technology-driven
world?
Or,
put another way: How ignorant can we afford to remain and not kill ourselves off
sooner than the Cosmos has already ordained?
No comments:
Post a Comment