Tuesday, May 25, 2010
The New York Times Explains LOST To You
Well, I too cried all through the finale’s two hours. But I wouldn’t have (I don’t think I would have...but who knows?) if I had known they were all dead the whole last six years.
Now that’s where the NYT and I differ in our opinions. This morning, the NYT’s Mike Hale said everything that happened on LOST’s island was real.
I guess Hale and I saw a different finale. Hale says he too thought they were all dead from the beginning and then he watched the finale a second time.
I’ve only seen the LOST finale once, and I haven’t read Doc Jensen’s finale final in EW yet. But, by me, from the moment Jack opened his eye in Segment One, Season One, they were all dead and going through a sort of Judgment Day reconciliation for the next six years, which could have happened in an eye-blink in eternity time. And actually did, by me, when Jack closed his eye last Sunday night and Judgment Day was over.
And I really hate that idea, but that is how it played out for me in the finale. Ugh!
And even through my tears (before realizing the last scene would be a communal funeral carrying everyone into the white light), I was disappointed in the hokey end. OHMYGOD! So much hokum. So many laughably contrived scenes. So much giggle-inducing crappola...like all that rope stuff and the guys not looking like they were really pulling on anything but ropes tied to n0thing.
Oh well...I do like the idea (my belief, not Mike Hale’s) that Hurley was the honcho all along through all the six-year-long Judgment Day proceedings and Ben was his assistant. Love that!
And BTW, is there a better actor in this world (and maybe the next) than Michael Emerson?
Here’s to you Ben Linus/Michael Emerson...long may you live in all possible worlds!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment